Broadstreet

Broadstreet

Share this post

Broadstreet
Broadstreet
Hollowing out the state
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Broadstreet
Broadstreet is an interdisciplinary blog dedicated to the study of historical political economy (HPE).
Already have an account? Sign in

Hollowing out the state

Pavithra Suryanarayan's avatar
Pavithra Suryanarayan
Aug 26, 2020
1

Share this post

Broadstreet
Broadstreet
Hollowing out the state
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

I doubt many of us picking out our 2020 American politics bingo cards anticipated a pitched battle over the continued existence of the post office. Or, that the USCIS could run out of funds, essentially halting legal immigration into the country (a more ludicrous aspect of this particular saga is that the USCIS has been unable to issue green cards and work permits because of a lack of printers!). Or that the census would try to change who it counts. For a casual observer these may appear to be troubling but disparate events that speak to the Trump government’s incompetence. To a discerning observer they may seem coordinated, but in the service of trying to win elections, or to bring about government reforms (depending on your ideological persuasion). A closer look, however, reveals that this is just one more episode in a long-running pattern in the United States of trying to weaken government capacity as a means for certain groups to hold on to power.

In places as different as the US and India, efforts are underway to weaken the administrative apparatus of the state: a phenomenon that I refer to as hollowing out the state.  It is a deliberate strategy of weakening the government’s ability to function in order to achieve ends that elites are unable to achieve through democratic channels.

The phenomenon of institutional weakening is not new to comparative politics scholars. Research like Brinks, Levitsky and Murillo’s recent volume on Latin America illuminates these dynamics in developing world contexts. But the sudden emergence of this phenomena in contexts like the US—long-standing democracies with robust governing capacity—raises interesting questions.

Research on capacity in the advanced industrial countries casts state-building as a slow moving and historically contingent process that occurred over centuries in response to war, underlying resource endowments, and through strategic choices made at pivotal moments.  A state’s ability to raise taxes plays a central role in this literature. This is because in order to be able to tax, states need to know where you live, how much you make, and be able to shake you down. The ability to extract creates a bureaucratic infrastructure that the state can deploy for other purposes. Importantly, in these places, the advent of strong bureaucratic capacity pre-dated mass electoral politics, and continues to be something we take for granted every day.

While we know a lot about where state capacity comes from and why it matters, the current moment is pushing us to ask a different question: to paraphrase Levistky and Ziblatt– how does  state capacity die?

Hollowing out the state in post-Reconstruction American South.

 In a new paper, Steven White and I illustrate one example of hollowing out the state. We study the period after the American Civil War, which ended slavery in the southern states. We look at two time periods. The first, Reconstruction (1865-1877), when the federal government provided protections for the political rights of southern black men, and when new taxes funded a range of public goods. This was followed, though, by “Redemption,” when southern white elites returned to power, reducing not just taxation but also the state’s governing capacity.  In figure 1 below, we map where the decline in taxation was most concentrated. Why did this happen?

Change in per capita taxation 1870-1880
Per capita taxation and historic levels of enslavement
Bureaucratic Capacity and intrawhite inequality

Second, the past and the present are connected by the coalitions that support President Trump, and those that were key to the success of state weakening during Reconstruction. This suggests that a coalition over the preservation of racial status might be an especially enduring basis to weaken state capacity in the present day just as it was in the 19thcentury.

Finally, it is worth considering whether the process of hollowing out the state is a phenomenon more likely in democracies where elites find electoral pathways to achieving policy objectives blocked. In these cases, uncertainty about the future, a weakening electoral map, and a racial coalition that makes institutional weakening possible, might set into motion active strategies to weaken state capacity, and in turn democracy itself, as was to occur in the American South in the late 19thcentury.


Subscribe to Broadstreet

Launched 4 months ago
Broadstreet is an interdisciplinary blog dedicated to the study of historical political economy (HPE).
Sally C.'s avatar
1 Like
1

Share this post

Broadstreet
Broadstreet
Hollowing out the state
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Myth of Meritocracy: How Exams Helped Build an Empire
By Peng Peng (Washington University in St. Louis)
Mar 31 • 
Broadstreet
156

Share this post

Broadstreet
Broadstreet
The Myth of Meritocracy: How Exams Helped Build an Empire
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
13
Feudalism as a Contested Concept in Historical Political Economy
“The tyrant feudalism must be declared once and for all deposed and its influence over students of the Middle Ages finally ended” (Elizabeth Brown…
Feb 24 • 
Mark Koyama
26

Share this post

Broadstreet
Broadstreet
Feudalism as a Contested Concept in Historical Political Economy
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
6
African Borders: Neither Random Nor Decided at the Berlin Conference
By Jack Paine (Emory University), Xiaoyan Qiu (Washington University in St. Louis) and Joan Ricart-Huguet (Loyola University Maryland
Mar 10 • 
Broadstreet
91

Share this post

Broadstreet
Broadstreet
African Borders: Neither Random Nor Decided at the Berlin Conference
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4

Ready for more?

© 2025 Broadstreet
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.